🔗 Share this article

This week marked a pivotal moment in the continuing political use of America's military, as the president delivered a highly partisan campaign speech to an extraordinary gathering of top military commanders.

Alarm Bells and Authoritarian Language

For observers worried about democratic institutions, multiple warning signs appeared during the speech: anti-progressive language commonplace on the political right, threats to dismiss military leaders who disagree, and transparent enthusiasm about deploying armed services for internal police actions.

The secrecy surrounding this rare meeting of military leaders, several of whom were recalled from overseas deployments, sparked speculation about possible major changes in military policy.

Substance Versus Spectacle

However, as with many administration actions, uncertainty persists about how much of the meeting was genuine policy versus made-for-TV drama.

Following a confidential summons to about 800 senior military leaders worldwide, Trump and his defense secretary presented a ten-item agenda covering topics ranging from urban military deployment to criticism about military leadership.

"The Democrats govern the majority of urban areas that are struggling," the president said. "What they've done to SF, the Windy City, NYC, Los Angeles, they're very unsafe places and we will straighten them out one by one."

Armed Forces as Internal Tool

Unambiguous statements came through: that the military serves at the president's pleasure, and that the fresh focus means internal use rather than foreign engagements.

"It's a war from within," he continued. At another point he proposed that US urban areas should become "practice areas" for armed forces activities.

Culture War Battles and Defense Culture

Yet these policy comments were overshadowed by lengthy addresses focusing heavily on ideological matters and armed forces image.

Prior to Trump's typical campaign speech, the defense secretary attacked diversity initiatives in rhetoric obviously intended to resonate with Trump's political base.

"No more heritage celebrations, DEI offices, men in women's clothing," Hegseth declared. "Stop global warming worship. Eliminate division, diversion or gender delusions. As I've said previously and will say once more, we are done with those nonsense."

Armed Forces Reaction and Assessment

Among military leadership, one prevailing sentiment was that it could have been more severe. Many had feared loyalty pledges or immediate purges of top commanders.

"The most significant development was what did not happen," observed one analysis from a DC think tank. "There was no purge of the generals, no alterations in the pledge of service, and no requirements that senior officers support political agendas."

The reaction among senior officers was not uniformly supportive. One defense leader apparently remarked that the meeting might as well have been a memo, characterizing it as more of a campaign rally than a substantive meeting.

Broader Context and Global Concerns

This incident represents yet another time Trump has faced accusations of employing the military as a political backdrop. Comparable issues arose in June when active-duty service members appeared during a speech where Trump attacked political opponents.

However, the recent gathering at the Virginia base was notable for its directness and the involvement of senior military officials from around the world.

"The messages emerging loud and clear from this government indicate they are far more at ease with domestic armed forces use than previous governments," observed a defense expert from a London-based research institute.

While several of the suggested shifts remain rhetorical for the moment, international leaders including church leaders have expressed concern about the consequences of such language.

"This manner of communication is concerning because it shows a rise in conflict," commented one prominent international figure. "We should hope it's just a manner of expression."