🔗 Share this article

The Russian central bank has announced it is pursuing compensation valued at $230 billion against the financial institution Euroclear. This move is a clear warning by the Kremlin against proposals to utilize immobilized Russian state funds to support Ukraine.

The Legal Claim

According to reports in local state media, the central bank initiated a lawsuit last week for an estimated 18 trillion roubles. This figure is equivalent to the stated $230 billion demand.

European Union officials are set to decide in the coming days regarding a proposal to use approximately €210 billion in frozen Russian assets. The proposal entails providing Ukraine with a substantial loan to fund its defence and financial stability.

The vast majority of these assets, amounting to €185 billion, reside at the Euroclear clearing house in Brussels. This institution serves as the primary custodian for the Russian immobilised financial reserves.

Dispute on Ownership

EU authorities have maintained that their proposal is legally sound. They argue rests on the principle that ownership of the sovereign wealth remains with Russia, even though it was frozen in EU countries shortly after the 2022 invasion of Ukraine.

Moscow, in contrast, has called any use of the assets as illegal appropriation. Authorities have threatened retaliatory measures, such as confiscating EU private investors' assets within Russia.

The head of Russia's sovereign wealth fund, who has taken on a key position in diplomatic talks, stated on a social media platform that Russia "will prevail in court" and regain its assets. He added that the European Union, the euro, and Euroclear "will face consequences" from the plan.

Geopolitical Maneuvering

In comments seen as an attempt to create division between Europe and the United States, Dmitriev characterized the assets plan as "a vicious attack on the right to ownership and the global financial system created by the United States."

Euroclear declined to provide a statement on the new legal action. The institution has previously stated it is contending with more than 100 lawsuits in Russian courts.

Enforcement Challenges

Although courts in EU countries are unlikely to enforce rulings from Russian courts, experts anticipate Moscow to pursue implementation in nations with closer ties to the Kremlin.

"The Bank of Russia could try to enforce a Russian court's decision against Euroclear in jurisdictions like China, Hong Kong, the UAE, Kazakhstan, and other sympathetic nations, provided that such assets can be located," commented a legal expert from an NSP law firm.

EU Countermeasures

European authorities indicated they are developing measures to discourage other countries from aiding any Russian lawsuits against European companies. They are also crafting safeguards to shield EU countries with investments in Russia from what they term "unlawful expropriation."

The Proposed Loan Mechanism

According to the complex plan, the EU would issue an first €90 billion loan to Ukraine, backed by the proceeds earned from the immobilized assets at Euroclear. Critically, Russia's ownership claim on the underlying funds would remain unaffected.

Ukraine would only be required to return the loan in the event that Russia consented to pay compensation for the vast damage inflicted during the nearly four-year war.

Alternative Proposals

Belgium, supported by Italy, Bulgaria, and Malta, has asked the EU to consider an alternative approach for financing Ukraine. This involves common EU debt issuance to secure a loan, using unused funds within the European budget.

This alternative move, however, demands unanimity among all 27 member states. Hungary's government, viewed as friendly with the Kremlin, has previously signaled its opposition.

Speaking on Monday, the EU foreign policy chief, a senior official, described the proposed loan scheme as "the most credible option" for aiding Ukraine. "This mechanism is secured against the Russian immobilized funds, which means it is not drawn from our public funds, which is equally significant," she stated. "It also sends a powerful message that if you do all this damage to another nation, you must pay for the rebuilding."